Former Stanford scholar King Vanga killed Pamela and Joe Juarez in a automobile crash again in 2021. That’s an undisputed reality. When the Juarez household instructed the college about the entire “killing two folks” factor, nevertheless, Vanga sued for defamation, claiming they couldn’t name him a assassin as a result of he had solely been charged with vehicular manslaughter. Because the Stanford Every day stories, although, in an precise victory without spending a dime speech protections, Vanga misplaced his lawsuit towards Priscilla Juarez late final month.
King Vanga, who killed Pamela and Joe Juarez along with his automobile, initially claimed a letter the Juarez household despatched Stanford was defamatory as a result of in it, they known as him a assassin, claimed he was below the affect on the time of the crash and asserted that he’d violated the Stanford Code of Conduct. Vanga denied all of these claims. The courtroom disagreed, saying the homicide and code of conduct claims had been opinions and thought of protected speech below the First Modification. The courtroom additionally dominated that Juarez had motive to imagine Vanga was below the affect on the time of the crash because it had been reported within the native information regardless of Vanga’s declare on the contrary:
On June 25, 2021, Vanga was concerned in a automobile accident in Atwater, California, which resulted within the deaths of Jose and Pamela Juarez. Vanga was charged with two counts of gross vehicular manslaughter whereas intoxicated, resisting an govt officer, trying to take a peace officer’s firearm and battery upon a peace officer. Vanga pleaded not responsible to those prices.
Vanga allegedly declined a breathalyzer check on the scene, in line with the regulation enforcement officer who responded to the accident. Nonetheless, the officer claimed that Vanga was below the affect. In response to the police report, the officer “detected a powerful odor of alcoholic beverage emitting from [Vanga’s] breath and individual and noticed his eyes had been crimson.”
The media tales that circulated within the subsequent days additionally said Vanga had been below the affect of both medicine, alcohol or each, as per regulation enforcement stories quoted inside the case.
This prompted Priscilla Juarez and a number of different members of the family to put in writing emails and letters to Stanford. In her electronic mail, she wrote she hoped the College would “take correct motion in dismissing this man as an energetic scholar of [the] morally prestigious establishment.”
…
In December 2021, Vanga threatened to sue Atwater police and California Freeway Patrol for alleged mistreatment and false accusation of a DUI. Vanga alleged he was punched, kicked and tased twice by responding officers. In the meantime, blood samples from the evening of the accident confirmed no presence of medication or alcohol.
Lawyer Ken “Popehat” White represented Juarez within the swimsuit, submitting an anti-SLAPP movement to have it dismissed on the grounds that the swimsuit violated his consumer’s First Modification rights. SLAPP stands for Strategic Lawsuit Towards Public Participation and customarily refers to lawsuits filed on questionable grounds with the intent to stifle free speech. Anti-SLAPP statutes enable defendants to have these lawsuits dismissed if the movement is granted and likewise get better any legal professional’s charges.
“There’s a pattern the place wealthy folks suppose that the poor ought to solely have as a lot free speech as they will afford. And that to me, [that’s] what this case was about, and that’s why I’m glad we now have a instrument just like the anti-SLAPP statute,” White instructed the Every day.
Sadly for the Juarezes, Vanga additionally filed defamation fits towards different members of the family and people nonetheless haven’t been in entrance of a decide. However whereas nothing is assured, it appears like White believes there’s a very good likelihood they’ll see comparable outcomes, telling the Every day, “Each case is somewhat totally different as a result of each case relies on what that defendant stated of their letter [to Stanford]. However in my opinion, [Priscilla Juarez’s family members] ought to be very optimistic based mostly on this end result.”
As we talked about when we first reported on this lawsuit, nobody pressured Vanga to sue the Juarez household. He might have merely let this entire factor go and centered on getting ready for his doubtless conviction. The results of killing two folks aren’t normally gratifying, however odds are, he most likely would have remained largely unknown outdoors of the Bay Space. As an alternative, he had the audacity to sue the household of the folks he killed along with his automobile, and in doing so, drew the eye of nationwide media. Consequently, much more folks know King Vanga killed Pamela and Joe Juarez along with his automobile in 2021.
It isn’t clear when King Vanga’s felony trial will start, however hopefully, it doesn’t take an excessive amount of longer. He deserves to face the results for what he did, whether or not he was below the affect on the time of the crash or not.
